Posts

Showing posts with the label IVF Lite

Infertility and it’s All the Major Related Misconceptions Around

Image
It’s since many years now that infertility has been quoted as a black spot for the dignity of most of the women around. Even though the issues are persistent with the men fraternity as well in the similar terms, women have mostly been targeted in the whole process. Moreover, it has now been deemed as a social disgrace for some individuals (particularly women) around. Even though the medical technology has seen some big advancement in the years passed by, there are still people around which are surrounded with various untrue misconceptions and myths about infertility treatment . With that said, let’s have a look at some of the major ones. 1. Infertility is a “Women’s issue” only   It’s since ages that women have been at the center of all the insult in terms of being infertile. Be it the Indian society or in general, they have to face the major wrath from around everywhere. Even though it’s now medically proceed that the men also come with an equal contribution in the same ...

IVF Lite - A New Strategy for Managing Poor Ovarian Res-ponders

IVFLite - Background: Previous trials have shown that neither conventional IVF nor natural cycle IVF is an effective treatment option for poor ovarian responders. However, none of the trials has examined the efficacy of accumulating embryos with serial minimal stimulation cycles, vitrifying the resulting embryos and transferring them in a remote cycle (IVF Lite protocol). Women with poor ovarian reserves, who commonly do not respond to conventional stimulation protocols, are left with few options when planning a family. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of serial minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization (msIVF) cycles with vitrification of embryos for treatment of poor ovarian responders (PORs) as compared to conventional IVF protocols. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective data analysis of PORs from June 2010 to November 2012. A total of 222 patients were included in the study. Ninety-seven patients underwent serial minimal stimulation cycl...